On 10/12/19 1:58 AM, Akim Demaille wrote:
I was about to rename the types for states as
yy_state_num -> yy_small_state_t
int -> yy_state_t
But the latter is seldom used, while the former appears many times, so I'd
prefer
yy_state_num -> yy_state_t
int -> yy_fast_state_t
WDYT?
yy_state_num values are typically narrower than int, so following Leibniz's
notational principle that notation should reflect reality, the former type name
should be narrower than the latter, which means your preference is better.
You might consider spelling that last name "yy_state_fast_t" for consistency
with stdint.h type names. Plus, whatever name is used, I suppose it should be
typedeffed to int_fastN_t (if available) instead of to plain int.
