> Le 14 oct. 2019 à 20:51, Paul Eggert <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> On 10/14/19 9:40 AM, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
>> Can we trust all the ls implementations to really issue the size at "column"
>> 5?
>
> It should be safe. It was standardized in POSIX 1003.2-1992. Some older 'ls'
> implementations put it in column 4, but they're long obsolete.
Good, thanks!
>> At least the CI agrees :) But since so far the test suite is still using
>> `...`, I used this version:
>> ...
>> +set x $(LC_ALL=C ls -l '$1') &&
>
> That $( ... ) should also be ` ... `.
Doh... Thanks, fixed!
