Hello Akim, Thank you for the feedback!
În sâm., 27 mar. 2021 la 08:35, Akim Demaille <[email protected]> a scris: > I see that you have keep the possibility for the regular pull parser > to use local variables. Have you benchmarked if this is worth the > effort? Because it there's no measurable difference, you may just > as well always use attributes of the parser object. That would simplify > the skeleton. > I benchmarked it, and there is no measurable difference. I put the variables as class attributes. > The patch does not apply cleanly. Could you please rebase it and > send it again? > Done. > > I have a question, I know you said at some point that you want to > > demonstrate the push parser support in the examples. How should I go > about > > it? A new, 'pushcalc' example, based on 'calc'? Or something similar to > > Java, where the 'calc' example also uses this directive? > > I don't think we need too many examples. So I would go with keeping > a super simple one, and have the other one grow with all the bells > and whistles, a bit like what the bistromathic example does in C. > I added the push parser to the 'calc' example. Adela
0001-d-add-push-parser-support.patch
Description: Binary data
0002-d-demonstrate-the-push-parser.patch
Description: Binary data
