On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 11:07 -0400, Sandro Magi wrote: > Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > > [...] > > This leads me to the question: should we add the monad concept to BitC? > > As an alternative, there is now even a Haskell dialect with an effect > system in place of monads: > > http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/DDC
Yes, but that doesn't address the objectives that adding a monad system would resolve: 1. Direct translation of existing haskell code. 2. Formal analyzability. However, I neglected to consider the impact of lazy vs. eager processing, and that is quite a major difference. shap _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
