Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > The problem that I anticipate here is that setting aside my personal > like for LISP, the LISP-y surface syntax actually *does* suck, and it is > going to present a significant impediment to BitC adoption. This issue > tends to push me away from macro processing solutions at the S-expr > level.
D-expressions might be of interest [1]; macros as used in the Dylan language. Sandro [1] http://people.csail.mit.edu/jrb/Projects/dexprs.pdf _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
