Gergely Buday wrote: > Jonathan Shapiro wrote: > > >>> Just out of curiosity, what prompted the switch from Python to C++ for >>> BitC? >>> >> At a certain point the complexity of the compiler got big enough that Python >> was no longer the right tool. We went to C++ rather than C because we wanted >> to use smart pointers. In hindsight, we should have stuck with C. >> > > Ever considered a functional language? >
Well, the obvious candidate is BitC itself. Is it far enough along (ignoring the syntax issue for the moment) to be able to do this? -Sam _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
