Rick R schrieb: > Would it be bad to rely on the C (Posix?) standard: <types.h> and the > int32_t int64_t etc.
While the meaning of "int32_t", etc is defined by the C standard for machines where they are available, the C standard does not require them to be supported everywhere. A machine that does not have an efficient way of operating with 32 bit quantities won't offer int32_t. IMO these types are only useful for really low-level stuff that's nonportable anyway. For portable code I use int_least32_t, int_fast32_t, etc instead. Philipp _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
