On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 5:19 PM, Pal-Kristian Engstad <[email protected]> wrote: > Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: >> I am not clear from your description what the distinction between >> letrec and let loop is, however. If "let loop" is used, does this mean >> that it is *required* for all invocations to be in tail position? >> Pardon my ignorance here! >> > Yes, that is exactly the intension.
Painful grimace. I actually like that idea. I'ld like it better if our current tail-call analyzer worked correctly. :-( shap _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
