One curiosity on the ML family is that value constructors default to prefix notation (constructor name first), while type names use postfix notation.
Because BitC has n-ary functions and constructors, the postfix type notation may turn out not to work for us -- I'm not yet sure. If it does, should we continue in the OCaml convention on this? shap _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
