> The problem is that in things like > f a b + f c d > we do not know how many arguments to "consume" for f until f is typed, > and we don't have that information at parse time.
Can you explain this more? Why not interpret "f a b + f c d" exactly as you'd
interpret "(f a b) + (f c d)"?
Matt
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
