On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Pal Engstad <[email protected]>wrote:
> Well, the problem is akin to using a pointer as an argument to a function > accepting a const-pointer (in C++), which is an error. I would expect BitC > to be at least as stringent! const pointer or pointer to const?
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
