On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 3:54 PM, David Jeske <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Bennie Kloosteman <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Single threaded ie no concurrency is an option for concurrency - right ? >> > > No. Single threaded is not > concurrent<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concurrency_(computer_science)> > . > > >> And these still achieve concurrency eg multiple node.js servers on a >> single machine. It just has nothing to do with the language / runtime.. >> > > The fact that it has nothing to do with the language or runtime is exactly > what I'm pointing out. "node.js async" is not a concurrency model. The > currency model is "shared nothing processes" or "Apartment Threading". > > > _______________________________________________ > bitc-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev > >
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
