On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Jonathan S. Shapiro <[email protected]>wrote:
> Also, sorry, my intent was to ask that these types be written in BitC > rather than in C/C++, > Without subtyping... does bitc have any mechanism to establish a structurally compatible type with a different trait compatibility namespace? It seems this would be required to achieve the type of const-ness I'm looking for.
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
