>> ObjectiveC ? WinRT ? Rust etc etc Whats deadly Most C programmers >> think 15% , but this is not relevant as we can apply further optomization. >> > > But that's my point. 15% (in concurrent it's *much* more than that) > really *isn't* okay, and so you *need* those optimizations. >
Im going to let this die because some Nursery designs ( like URC) can have no header ( im thinking small 1 word messages and commands passing through a nursery with very low costs is very attractive for some systems) ... but my point is not what we can do or need as it applies to both ( and will be applied ) , but reference counting penalty in C++ is much lower ( even if dog slow ) than basic reference counting in Java . Why ? is it because of the header java vs the fat pointer . Ben
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
