On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Sandro Magi <[email protected]> wrote:
> If I'm following you correctly, this sounds close to the work in Type > Classes as Objects and Implicits [1], which also references the related > work on JavaGI's "generalized interfaces" [2]: > > Your approach also seems close to C++ concepts, which are also discussed > in the above paper. Thanks for the pointers. I'll read. I'm not sure I really have an "approach" here. I'm still trying to understand the questions. It's good to do that before trying to understand the answers. :-)
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
