On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Raoul Duke <[email protected]> wrote:
> it is probably a given that any security thing which has come to date > has serious problems. and any future ones will. :) one question is > about if it is predicated on the right basic ideas e.g. the ocap vs. > acl sort of difference. is it that the fundamental abstractions are > wrong? > Right. That's exactly the sort of security discussion I *don't* want to get mired in right at the moment, because I think it deserves a separate discussion. In this thread, I'm definitely interested in whether reflection and the existing security model combine in problematic ways, but I don't want to get into the OCap vs ACL debate - that's been covered elsewhere. :-) Jonathan
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
