On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Jonathan S. Shapiro <[email protected]> wrote:
> Since I'm not sure whether we will even have object ids, I'm not sure how to
> respond. The real question would be whether EQ type checks over that
> reference comparison.

I don't see a case where that wouldn't just be a different way of
asking the same question.

> I think we should take the question of the object ID notion up separately.

Well it sure looks like we should take it up. But I think it's
important for object id to be harmonious (for lack of a specific term)
with the way capabilities control permissions.
(In case it wasn't clear, that wasn't a specific proposal, I'm just
saying there's an interaction to worry about.)
_______________________________________________
bitc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev

Reply via email to