depends on your audience. people who already grok haskell, ml, &c.
will already know that all those things are related. but people like
me who don't get to use those languages for their day job, only dream
of such fantasy lifestyles, can easily be in the, "wait, what? where
did that come from?" mode with all this kinda stuff.

like, i find myself in a situation where i want to deal with the
'shape' so the i have to try to find out how that is managed in the
language, and if it is never called out very clearly as its own
concept -- because it has been all along syntactically mixed up with
the other, related, things -- then it can be hell to figure out wtf
and teach myself from the docs.

the more things can be called out as individual concepts, the better
the docs will be and the easier it will be for people to self teach.
_______________________________________________
bitc-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev

Reply via email to