I'm sorry. My last response to Keann was too strong. I'm prepared to be convinced that there is something here, and I'm also prepared to be convinced that there may be a better way to express intentional specialization than the one I'm imagining (indeed, I think we *need* a better way than I presently have). But I'm *very* concerned about the dynamic character of this.
shap
_______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
