This thread went off the rails once I asked Keean a general question about his design philosophy. Sorry about that. I'm going to start a new thread about the way Keean's using type classes.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:17 AM, Matt Oliveri <[email protected]> wrote: > Why, Keean? Why does it have to be type classes? What is so worthy > about type classes that all things in type systems must be shoehorned > into them? _______________________________________________ bitc-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.coyotos.org/mailman/listinfo/bitc-dev
