On 06/30/2015 09:12 AM, Adam Back wrote: > It is correct to view first-seen miner and relay policy as > honour-based, though it is the current default. > > What would be the effect of IBLT on the first seen policy? It seems that if a miner has to broadcast extra data with his blocks because he's using full RBF and everyone else is using first-seen then his blocks are at a disadvantage in terms of propagation. That wouldn't make first-seen a hard consensus rule, but rather one rational miners are likely to follow. Or is this effect likely to be minimal? _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Full Replace-by-Fee depl... Peter Todd
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Full Replace-by-Fee ... Luke Dashjr
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Full Replace-by-Fee deployment sc... [email protected]
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Full Replace-by-Fee deployment sc... Tom Harding
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Full Replace-by-Fee deployme... Natanael
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Full Replace-by-Fee depl... Tom Harding
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Full Replace-by-Fee ... Natanael
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Full Replace-by-... Tom Harding
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Full Replace-by-Fee deployme... Peter Todd
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Full Replace-by-Fee depl... Adam Back
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Full Replace-by-Fee ... Chris Pacia
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Full Replace-by-... Peter Todd
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Full Replace-by-Fee ... David A. Harding
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Full Replace-by-Fee ... Peter Todd
- Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP: Full Replace-by-... Chris Pacia
