On August 13, 2015 7:34:03 PM GMT+03:00, Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev <[email protected]> wrote: >Would be wonderful to have this pushed together with CLTV and BIP68. >If BIP68 get pushed in the next fork, this CSV is a no brainer. > >Was there a competing RCLTV implementation somewhere that did not >depend on >BIP68 for information ? I don't manage to find it.
I think all such competing proposals are dropped because this seemed like a better idea. Feel free to revive one/come up with one, though. Matt _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
