Add: For - If everyone agrees an increase is required at some point, The longer you leave it the greater the numbers who have to upgrade
Against - Insufficient testing before moving to production ready releases sets a bad precedent On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:11 PM, Elliot Olds via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Jorge Timón < > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > >> To be clear, these two are just my personal lists of arguments on >> "each side" to clear my mind and try to be perfectly objective. >> [...] >> Here's the updated both-thread lists: >> >> >> http://0bin.net/paste/igHZMgeoIbYjCJd9#ovaOUlSAKvQYT2p3VXuIuUmNk2XyLH-GnjR5NZMZgFb > > > I thought this was a good idea, so I turned my personal notes into a site > attempting to list all the strongest arguments and counterarguments on the > block size debate. I made mine a bit more detailed. > > Here's the site: https://sites.google.com/site/bitcoinblocksizedebate/ > > Feedback welcome. > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > >
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
