Can we please keep this mail chain discussion specific to the proposed draft - https://github.com/UpalChakraborty/bips/blob/master/BIP-DynamicMaxBlockSize.mediawiki ?
I understand, voting process is an important subject of discussion. But, that may be discussed in a separate mail chain. On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Hector Chu via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On 26 August 2015 at 01:29, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev > <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > For instance, a very simple toy example that would work is just XORing > your vote with SHA256(the entire blockchain) > > Uh, that would totally not work. > > I think my proposal of using CLTV to lock coins (votes) is better. > Failing a soft-fork to implement that in time, counting votes from the > UTXO set is also ok - the difference between that and CLTV is that it > is not as strong an evidence of commitment. > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
