I think it's a reasonable approach. Once the number is assigned, the
change is made and the pull request is updated.
Only thing is it would be nice to be able to indicate which pull
requests are number requests and which pull requests are ready for
merging. Perhaps we should make a special label for number requests.
- Eric
------ Original Message ------
From: "Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev"
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Bitcoin Dev" <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Sent: 9/3/2015 4:18:08 PM
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed minor change to BIP 01 to use a PR for
request assignment
The process in BIP01 was written when we used a different solution for
storing and presenting BIPs.
I'm thinking of suggesting that the number request process be changed
to opening a pull req with BIP text with no number (e.g. just using
the authors name and an index as the number) as the mechenism to
request number assignment.
Is there any reason that anyone would find this objectionable?
(Please do not respond to this message with anything but a strictly
directed answer to that question, start a new thread for a different
subject. Thanks!)
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
