I think it would be more akin to bip70. I have a similar proposal, largely already written up around this. I'm very interested in having this for multi signature wallets. On 14 Sep 2015 8:06 pm, "Arthur - bitcoin-fr.io via bitcoin-dev" < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> Hi, > I realized that there isn't any way to ask for a signature (or to verify a > message) as easily you can do when requesting a payment using a bitcoin URI > scheme (BIP0021). > I think a URI scheme to use the signing tools in bitcoin core might be > useful, and with a proper consensus it could become available in most > bitcoin clients who already support message signing/verifying and payment > url (or QRCode) and enable new uses of bitcoin signatures. > A way to gain proper consensus is going through a BIP, so that's why I'm > here: to present my idea publicly before going any further (draft BIP and > reference implementation). > Some thoughts > - like BIP0021: "Bitcoin clients MUST NOT act on URIs without getting the > user's authorization." so signing requires the user to manually approve the > process > - it could use the same URI scheme than BIP0021 with an additional > parameter (ex: signaction=<verify/sign>) or use another one like BIP121 > (ex: btcsig:) > PS : I'll also post a topic in "Development & Technical Discussion" > section on Bitcointalk > > -- > Arthur Bouquet > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > >
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
