On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Paul Sztorc via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > However, the two are also perfect compliments, as LN transactions cannot take > place at all without periodic on-chain transactions.
Additionally, lightning network hot wallets are not an ideal place to store large quantities of BTC and users that don't expect to be actively using LN should in general prefer confirmed UTXOs for long-term cold storage. So far the guess that I have seen floating around is that LN usage will at first be restricted to very tiny amounts of BTC in tiny hot wallets, since nobody is particularly interested in running large hot wallets. - Bryan http://heybryan.org/ 1 512 203 0507 _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
