That conversation missed a second issue. Namely that there is no way to punish 
people if there is a double spend in a micro block that happens in key block 
which reorg'd away the first transaction. eg one miner mines a transaction in a 
micro block, another miner (either by not having seen the first yet, or being 
malicious - potentially the same miner) mines a key block which reorgs away the 
first micro block and then, in their first micro block, mines a double spend. 
This can happen at any time, so you end up having to fall back to regular full 
blocks for confirmation times :(.

Also, Greg Slepak brought up a good point on twitter at 
https://twitter.com/taoeffect/status/654358023138209792. Noting that this model 
means users could no longer pick transactions in a mining pool which was set up 
in such a way (it could be tweaked to do so with separate rewards and pubkeys, 
but now the user can commit fraud at a much lower cost - their own pool reward, 
not the block's total reward).

On October 14, 2015 11:28:51 AM PDT, Ittay via bitcoin-dev 
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Bryan Bishop <kanz...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Emin Gün Sirer
>> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > while the whitepaper has all the nitty gritty details:
>> >      http://arxiv.org/abs/1510.02037
>>
>> Taking reward compensation back by fraud proofs is not enough to fix
>> the problems associated with double spending (such as, everyone has
>to
>> wait for the "real" confirmations instead of the "possibly
>> double-spend" confirmations). Some of this was discussed in -wizards
>> recently:
>> http://gnusha.org/bitcoin-wizards/2015-09-19.log
>
>
>Fraud proof removes all the attacker's revenue. It's like the attacker
>sacrifices an entire block for double spending in the current system. I
>think Luke-Jr got it right at that discussion.
>
>Best,
>Ittay
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>bitcoin-dev mailing list
>bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
>https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

Reply via email to