On Friday, November 13, 2015 09:53:57 PM Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> The first text is explaining nlocktime without BIP65 in order to
> explain the reason for having BIP65.

Thanks. I would recommend changing the BIP65 to clarify what you just said, 
this clearly is the missing piece of information there.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

Reply via email to