On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 01:32:58PM -0800, Eric Lombrozo via bitcoin-dev wrote: > After a little more though (and some comments from aj), I realize that the > opcode naming convention is actually CHECK <condition > VERIFY. > > Therefore, the full opcode name should be CHECKRELATIVELOCKTIMEVERIFY. > > However, this name is ridiculously long, so at least some part will require > abbreviation. > > In typical script example usage, most sensible seems to be to abbreviate both > CLTV and CRLTV.
...and CRLTV is hard to visually distinguish from CLTV. :( You know, calling it AGEVERIFY is short and sweet. -- 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org 00000000000000000ef246c814f8cb8c1a26bc3c6cb1286bdbc5f4140ed3fc79
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
