Jannes Faber via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> writes: > Segregated IBLT > > I was just wondering if it would make sense when we have SW to also make > Segregated IBLT? Segregating transactions from signatures and then tune the > parameters such that transactions have a slightly higher guarantee and save > a bit of space on the signatures side.
It just falls out naturally. If the peer doesn't want the witnesses, they don't get serialized into the IBLT. Cheers, Rusty. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
