On 12/26/2015 05:01 PM, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev wrote: > I think the shortest reasonable timeframe for an uncontroversial > hardfork is somewhere in the range between 6 and 12 months.
This argument would hold more weight if it didn't looks like a stalling tactic in context. 6 months ago, there was a concerted effort to being the process then, for exactly this reason. After 6 months of denial, stonewalling, and generally unproductive fighting, the need for proactivity is being acknowledged with no reference to the delay. If the network ever ends up making a hasty forced upgrade to solve a capacity emergency the responsibility for that difficulty will not fall on those who did their best to prevent emergency upgrades by planning ahead.
0xEAD9E623.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
