The UTXO sets may diverge but they actually will be strict subsets/supersets of each other as no transaction would be invalid on one fork vs another unless the hard fork lasts longer than 100 blocks. This is of course specific to a block limit change hard fork.
On 2015/12/31, at 13:39, joe2015--- via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> So I'm very strongly against this "generalized softfork" idea -- I also don't >> see how upgraded nodes and non-upgraded nodes can possibly end up with the >> same >> UTXO set. > > The only way for non-upgraded nodes to get the correct UTXO set is to upgrade. > > It is important to keep in mind this was proposed as an alternative to a > hardfork. With a hardfork the UTXOs also diverge as upgraded and > non-upgraded clients follow different chains. > > --joe. > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
