Greg Maxwell wrote:
> What are you talking about? You seem profoundly confused here...
>
> I obtain some txouts. I write a transaction spending them in malleable
> form (e.g. sighash single and an op_return output).. then grind the
> extra output to produce different hashes. After doing this 2^32 times
> I am likely to find two which share the same initial 8 bytes of txid.
[9 May 16 @ 4:30 PDT]
I’m trying to understand the collision attack that you're explaining to Tom
Zander.
Mathematica is telling me that if I generated 2^32 random transactions, that
the chances that the initial 64-bits on one of the pairs of transactions is
about 40%. So I am following you up to this point. Indeed, there is a good
chance that a pair of transactions from a set of 2^32 will have a collision in
the first 64 bits.
But how do you actually find that pair from within your large set? The only
way I can think of is to check if the first 64-bits is equal for every possible
pair until I find it. How many possible pairs are there?
It is a standard result that there are
m! / [n! (m-n)!]
ways of picking n numbers from a set of m numbers, so there are
(2^32)! / [2! (2^32 - 2)!] ~ 2^63
possible pairs in a set of 2^32 transactions. So wouldn’t you have to perform
approximately 2^63 comparisons in order to identify which pair of transactions
are the two that collide?
Perhaps I made an error or there is a faster way to scan your set to find the
collision. Happy to be corrected…
Best regards,
Peter
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
