On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 09:33:24PM -0300, Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev wrote: > If I send a transaction to an IoT device (say to an OpenDime or to the old > Firmcoin), and the OpenDime must verify that the transaction has been mined > (SPV verification), then it may expect the witness program to be of certain > maximum size (an implementation-imposed limit). If a Miner modifies the > witness size and makes it too large, then the device may not be able to > accept the transaction and the bitcoins may be lost. Lost because the > private key is in the device, and because the device cannot accept that > cloned transaction, never ever. > > The same is true (although less strict) for side-chains and drive-chains: > they may have certain restrictions on the size of transactions they accept > to lock bitcoins. > > That's why I'm proposing that a transaction becomes INVALID if the witness > size is higher than the expected size (by the sender).
An important part of the design of segwit is that resource constained devices doing lite-client verification don't need to get witness data at all to verify lite-client merkle-path proofs. Remember that lite-clients can't verify anything useful in witnesses anyway, so for them to have witness data is useless (unless they're doing some kind of embedded consensus protocol with data published in witnesses, but few people here care about that use-case). -- https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
