On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Matt Corallo <lf-li...@mattcorallo.com> wrote: > Even if the Bitcoin Foundation decided to recklessly disregard Bitcoin's > future centralization, I'm not sure going to them and asking them to pay > a license fee in order to keep from holding the rest of the Bitcoin > mining community hostage counts as "regard for centralization pressure". > It also doesn't excuse the lack of transparent licensing being available > today, or the lack of transparency when discussing it in public after > the patent had been filed.
We can't change the past (besides, would you want BCF to have owned that patent? I didn't)-- only the future. To do so requires collaboration, so lets focus on that. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
