> On 14 Dec 2016, at 19:07, Luke Dashjr <l...@dashjr.org> wrote: > > On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 11:01:58 AM Johnson Lau via bitcoin-dev wrote: >> There is no reason to use a timestamp beyond 4 bytes. > > Actually, there is: lock times... my overflow solution doesn't have a > solution > to that. :x
You could steal a few bits form tx nVersion through a softfork _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
