On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Sergio Demian Lerner via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> The hard-fork is conditional to 95% of the hashing power has approved the > segwit2mb soft-fork and the segwit soft-fork has been activated (which > should occur 2016 blocks after its lock-in time) > Miners signalling they have upgraded by flipping a bit in the nVersion field has little relevance in a hard fork. If 100% of the hash power indicates they are running this proposal, but the nodes don't upgrade, what will happen? For the record, I actually talk a lot about hard forks with various developers and am very interested in the research that Johnson in particular is pioneering. However, I have failed to understand your point about 95% miner signalling in relation to a hard fork, so I am eagerly awaiting your explanation.
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
