I really like the idea of extending signalling capabilities to the end-users. It gives stakeholders a voice in the decisions we take in the network, and are a clear signal to all other involved parties. It reminds me of a student thesis I supervised some time ago [1], in which we explored various signalling ideas.
I think we have a number of fields that may be used for such a signalling, e.g., OP_RETURN, locktime, and output scripts. I think OP_RETURN is probably not the field you'd want to use though since it adds data that needs to be transferred, stored for bootstrap, and outputs in the UTXO would need to be tagged with additional information. Locktime has the advantage of being mostly a freeform field for values in the past, but it clashes with other uses that may rely on it. Furthermore, it is the transaction creator that specifies the locktime, hence the signal trails one hop behind the current owner, i.e., the actual stakeholder. I think probably the best field to signal would be the output script. It is specified by the recipient of the funds, i.e., the current owner, and is already stored in the UTXO, so a single pass can tally up the votes. We could for example use the last 4 bits of the pubkey/pubkeyhash to opt in (3 leading 0 bits) and the vote (0/1 depending on the stakeholders desired signal). We'd need to define similar semantics for other script types, but getting the standard scripts to be recognized should be simple. In the spirit of full disclosure I'd like to also mention some of the downsides of voting this way. Unlike the OP_RETURN proposal, users that do not intend to signal will also be included in the tally. I'd expect the signals of these users to be random with a 50% chance of either outcome, so they should not influence the final result, but may muddy the water depending on what part of the population is signalling. The opt-in should make sure that the majority of votes are actually voluntary votes, and not just users that randomly select a pubkey/pubkeyhash, and can be adjusted as desired, though higher values require more grinding on behalf of the users. The grinding may also exacerbate some problems we already have with the HD Wallet lookahead, since we now skip a number of addresses, so we should not require too many opt-in bits. So there are some problems we'd need to tackle, but I'm really excited about this, as it could provide data to make informed decisions, and should put an end to the endless speculation about the will of the economic majority. Cheers, Christian [1] http://pub.tik.ee.ethz.ch/students/2015-HS/SA-2015-30.pdf
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev