I'm highly unconvinced of this point. Sure, you can change fewer lines of code, but if the result is, lets be honest, shit, how do you believe its going to have a higher chance of getting acceptance from the broader community? I think you're over-optimizing in the wrong direction.
Matt On 05/09/17 20:58, Sergio Demian Lerner wrote: > I agree with you Matt. > I'm artificially limiting myself to changing the parameters of Segwit as > it is.. > > This is motivated by the idea that a consensual HF in the current state > would have greater chance of acceptance if it changes the minimum number > of lines of code. > > > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Gregory Maxwell <g...@xiph.org > <mailto:g...@xiph.org>> wrote: > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Matt Corallo > <lf-li...@mattcorallo.com <mailto:lf-li...@mattcorallo.com>> wrote: > > at beast. > > Rawr. > > _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
