BIP 177 is NOT assigned. Do not self-assign BIP numbers! Please read BIP 2:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0002.mediawiki Luke On Sunday 24 December 2017 2:57:38 AM Damian Williamson via bitcoin-dev wrote: > BIP 177: UTPFOTIB - Use Transaction Priority For Ordering Transactions In > Blocks > > > This BIP proposes to address the issue of transactional reliability in > Bitcoin, where valid transactions may be stuck in the mempool for extended > periods. > > > There are two key issues to be resolved: > > > 1. The current transaction bandwidth limit. > 2. The current ad-hoc methods of including transactions in blocks > resulting in variable and confusing confirmation times for valid > transactions, including transactions with a valid fee that may never > confirm. > > > It is important with any change to protect the value of fees as these will > eventually be the only payment that miners receive. Rather than an auction > model for limited bandwidth, the proposal results in a stable fee for > priority service auction model. > > > I will post the full proposal up on to my blog in the coming days and, > re-review incorporating feedback that I have received on and off thread. > It would not be true to suggest that all feedback received has been > entirely positive although, most of it has been constructive. > > > The previous threads for this BIP are available here: > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-December/subje > ct.html > > > Regards, > > Damian Williamson _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev