On Thursday 15 March 2018 7:36:48 AM Karl Johan Alm wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Luke Dashjr <l...@dashjr.org> wrote: > > Ideally, it should support not only just "proof I receive at this > > address", but also "proof of funds" (as a separate feature) since this > > is a popular misuse of the current message signing (which doesn't > > actually prove funds at all). To do this, it needs to be capable of > > signing for multiple inputs. > > Re-reading this, I think what you mean is it should be possible to > create a proof for (a) specific UTXO(s), hence "inputs". That sounds > pretty useful, yeah!
Not necessarily specific UTXOs (that would contradict fungibility, as well as be impossible for hot/cold wallet separation), but just to prove funds are available. The current sign message cannot be used to prove present possession of funds, only that you receive funds. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
