Hi Omer, Are there any candidates for non-interactive threshold signatures? Interactive signatures are not very suitable for air-gapped use cases.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 11:18 AM Omer Shlomovits via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Hello all, > > I am working for the past few months with collaborators (in cc) on > providing Rust reference implementations to existing multi party schemes > for Schnorr signatures [1]. This includes aggregated signatures, > accountable signatures (which for n out of n are multi-signatures) and > threshold signatures (wip). > The project can be found here: > https://github.com/KZen-networks/multi-party-schnorr . > We aim that if the protocol is run in a configuration of a single party it > will be bip-schnorr [2] compliant. > > Hope you'll find it useful :) > Questions, suggestions and pull requests are welcome! > > > [1] > https://github.com/KZen-networks/multi-party-schnorr/tree/master/papers > [2] https://github.com/sipa/bips/blob/bip-schnorr/bip-schnorr.mediawiki > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
