On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 3:16 PM Johnson Lau <jl2...@xbt.hk> wrote: > > I proposed the same in BIP114. I wish Satoshi had designed that way. >
Thanks. I probably read that and internalized it and forgot you wrote it. > But I’m not sure if that would do more harm than good. For example, people > might lose money by copying an existing script template. But they might > also lose money in the same way as CHECKMULTISIG is disabled. So I’m not > sure. > > Another related thing I’d like to bikeshed is to pop the stack after > OP_CLTV and OP_CSV. The same pros and cons apply. > This one is almost a no-brainer I think. Nearly every instance of OP_CSV is followed by an OP_DROP and we'd save 1 WU per OP_CSV if we pop the stack afterwards.
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
