Reject messages cannot be replaced for debugging user problems. At least unless you plan to make RPC or bitcoind logfiles available via the P2P protocol (both probably not a good idea).
The typical case is, I get mailed a wallet logfile with reject messages and that's all I have. I cannot access the bitcoind logfile(s) of the node(s) that generated the reject message in the first place. Nor can I access their RPC interface. I strongly suggest re-enabling reject messages by default before 0.18. On 06/03/2019 01.53, Marco Falke via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Bitcoin Core may send "reject" messages as response to "tx", "block" or > "version" messages from a network peer when the message could not be accepted. > > This feature is toggled by the `-enablebip61` command line option and has been > disabled by default since Bitcoin Core version 0.18.0 (not yet released as of > time of writing). Nodes on the network can not generally be trusted to send > valid ("reject") messages, so this should only ever be used when connected to > a > trusted node. At this time, I am not aware of any software that requires this > feature, and I would like to remove if from Bitcoin Core to make the codebase > slimmer, easier to understand and maintain. Let us know if your application > relies on this feature and you can not use any of the recommended > alternatives: > > * Testing or debugging of implementations of the Bitcoin P2P network protocol > should be done by inspecting the log messages that are produced by a recent > version of Bitcoin Core. Bitcoin Core logs debug messages > (`-debug=<category>`) to a stream (`-printtoconsole`) or to a file > (`-debuglogfile=<debug.log>`). > > * Testing the validity of a block can be achieved by specific RPCs: > - `submitblock` > - `getblocktemplate` with `'mode'` set to `'proposal'` for blocks with > potentially invalid POW > > * Testing the validity of a transaction can be achieved by specific RPCs: > - `sendrawtransaction` > - `testmempoolaccept` > > * Wallets should not use the absence of "reject" messages to indicate a > transaction has propagated the network, nor should wallets use "reject" > messages to set transaction fees. Wallets should rather use fee estimation > to determine transaction fees and set replace-by-fee if desired. Thus, they > could wait until the transaction has confirmed (taking into account the fee > target they set (compare the RPC `estimatesmartfee`)) or listen for the > transaction announcement by other network peers to check for propagation. > > I propose to remove "reject" messages from Bitcoin Core 0.19.0 unless there > are > valid concerns about its removal. > > Marco > _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev