Hi Sjors, On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 2:12 PM Sjors Provoost <sj...@sprovoost.nl> wrote:
> Transaction weight currently doesn't consider OP codes, it only considers > if bytes are part of the witness. Changing that to something more akin to > Ethereums gas pricing sounds too complicated to even consider. > I did say per executed OP_CODESEPARATOR, but upon reflection, I agree that we'd like to know the weight without execution. I think counting the number of occurrences of OP_CODESEPARATOR (perhaps at the same time we count OP_CHECKSIG operations?) is a reasonable compromise, and increasing the weight according to my proposed formula based on that count (ideally we'd take OP_IF branches into account). > I would also like to believe that whoever went through the trouble of > using OP_CODESEPARATOR reads this list. > I wish this were the case too, but I don't think it is reasonable to assume that (even maaku isn't subscribed <https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15482#issuecomment-469836918>), and I don't even think it is fair to assume such a someone necessarily even speaks English.
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
