Indeed, Signet is no less (or more) Bitcoin than a seed format or BIP 32. It’s “not Bitcoin” but it’s certainly “interoperability for how to build good testing for Bitcoin”.
> On Oct 14, 2019, at 19:55, Karl-Johan Alm via bitcoin-dev > <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > The pull request to the bips repository for Signet has stalled, as the > maintainer isn't sure Signet should have a BIP at all, i.e. "is Signet > Bitcoin?". > > My argument is that Signet is indeed Bitcoin and should have a BIP, as > this facilitates the interoperability between different software in > the Bitcoin space. > > Feedback welcome, here or on the pull request itself: > https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/803 > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev