Thanks for explaining where instructions are lacking. How does this look? https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1046/files
On Friday 18 December 2020 01:44:27 dentondevelopment wrote: > Hi Luke, > > It looks to have the same motivations and be compatible with > https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/253 (if I am reading it correctly). > > The only guidance I have on proposing a bip is what is on the readme > https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/README.mediawiki > > 48 would be fitting if it is unused. > > This is still very much a work in progress and there does seem to be > community support. > > Pavol and others have shared relevant info/suggestions which I will be > using to update the proposal. > > Will share again here when the next draft is ready. > > Many thanks, > Fontaine > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > On Thursday, December 17, 2020 1:16 AM, Luke Dashjr <l...@dashjr.org> wrote: > > BIP number 48 has not been assigned. Do not self-assign BIP numbers. > > > > Is this intended to be compatible with > > https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/253 ? > > > > Luke > > > > On Wednesday 16 December 2020 14:10:28 dentondevelopment via bitcoin-dev > > > > wrote: > > > Here is the repo instead of a static link: > > > https://github.com/Fonta1n3/bips/blob/master/bip-0048.mediawiki > > > Fontaine > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > > > On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 8:43 PM, dentondevelopment via > > > bitcoin-dev > > > > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I would like to propose bip48 (taking bip44 as inspiration), with the > > > > purpose of documenting modern multi-sig derivations. > > > > Please see a rough draft of the proposed bip attached, comments/input > > > > welcome. > > > > Regards, > > > > Fontaine _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
