Unless there are objections, I intend to add Kalle Alm as a BIP editor to assist in merging PRs into the bips git repo.
Since there is no explicit process to adding BIP editors, IMO it should be fine to use BIP 2's Process BIP progression: > A process BIP may change status from Draft to Active when it achieves > rough consensus on the mailing list. Such a proposal is said to have > rough consensus if it has been open to discussion on the development > mailing list for at least one month, and no person maintains any > unaddressed substantiated objections to it. A Process BIP could be opened for each new editor, but IMO that is unnecessary. If anyone feels there is a need for a new Process BIP, we can go that route, but there is prior precedent for BIP editors appointing new BIP editors, so I think this should be fine. Please speak up soon if you disagree. Luke _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
