Hi ZmnSCPxj, The rate-limiting algorithm would be relatively straightforward. I documented the rate-limiting part of the algorithm below, perhaps they can evoke new ideas of how to make this MAST-able or otherwise implement this in a privacy preserving way.
Something like the following: => Create an output at block height [h0] with the following properties: Serving as input at any block height, the maximum amount is limited to [limit] sats; // This rule introduces [limit] and is permanent and always copied over to a change output Serving as input at a block height < [h0 + window], the maximum amount is limited to [limit - 0] sats; // [limit - 0] to emphasize that nothing was spent yet and no window has started. => A transaction occurs at block height [h1], spending [h1_spent]. The payment output created at [h1] is not encumbered and of value [h1_spent]; // Note, this is the first encumbered transaction so [h1] is the first block of the first window The change output created at block height [h1] must be encumbered as follows: Serving as input at any block height, the maximum amount is limited to [limit] sats; // Permanent rule repeats Serving as input at a block height < [h1 + window], the maximum amount is limited to [limit - h1_spent] // Second permanent rule reduces spendable amount until height [h1 + window] by [h1_spent] => A second transaction occurs at block height [h2], spending [h2_spent]. The payment output created at [h2] is not encumbered and of value [h2_spent]; // Second transaction, so a second window starts at [h2] The change output created at block height [h2] must be encumbered as follows: Serving as input at any block height, the maximum amount is limited to [limit] sats; // Permanent rule repeats Serving as input at a block height < [h1 + window], the max amount is limited to [limit - h1_spent - h2_spent] // Reduce spendable amount between [h1] and [h1 + window] by an additional [h2_spent] Serving as input in range [h1 + window] <= block height < [h2 + window], the max amount is limited to [limit - h2_spent] // First payment no longer inside this window so [h1_spent] no longer subtracted ... and so on. A rule that pertains to a block height < the current block height can be abandoned, keeping the number of rules equal to the number of transactions that exist within the oldest still active window. Zac On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 4:22 PM ZmnSCPxj <zmnsc...@protonmail.com> wrote: > Good morning Zac, > > > Hi ZmnSCPxj, > > > > Thank you for your helpful response. We're on the same page concerning > privacy so I'll focus on that. I understand from your mail that privacy > would be reduced by this proposal because: > > > > * It requires the introduction of a new type of transaction that is > different from a "standard" transaction (would that be P2TR in the > future?), reducing the anonymity set for everyone; > > * The payment and change output will be identifiable because the change > output must be marked encumbered on-chain; > > * The specifics of how the output is encumbered must be visible on-chain > as well reducing privacy even further. > > > > I don't have the technical skills to judge whether these issues can > somehow be resolved. In functional terms, the output should be spendable in > a way that does not reveal that the output is encumbered, and produce a > change output that cannot be distinguished from a non-change output while > still being encumbered. Perhaps some clever MAST-fu could somehow help? > > I believe some of the covenant efforts may indeed have such clever MAST-fu > integrated into them, which is why I pointed you to them --- the people > developing these (aj I think? RubenSomsen?) might be able to accommodate > this or some subset of the desired feature in a sufficiently clever > covenant scheme. > > There are a number of such proposals, though, so I cannot really point you > to one that seems likely to have a lot of traction. > > Regards, > ZmnSCPxj >
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
